Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Action Against Selmer
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided April 14, 1995No. C8-93-1638PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition for disciplinary action with this court alleging that respondent Scott E. Selmer had committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline. A referee found that Scott E. Selmer, an attorney licensed in the State of Minnesota since 1984, had violated the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to promptly provide an accounting (Minn.R.Prof.Conduct 1.4, 1.5(c) and 1.15(b) (1985)); by charging and suing to collect an unreasonable fee and by abusing the discovery process in litigation…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RuffenachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against IsaacsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. BellottiCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Matter of Discipline of BealSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by12 opinions
- Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SelmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re CareySupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SelmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- In Re Disciplinary Action Against MilloySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.