Scott Douglas Nordstrom v. State of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, we are asked to determine the scope of petitioner Scott Douglas Nordstrom’s sentencing trial, which is scheduled as a result of our supreme court’s decision in State v. Nordstrom, 206 Ariz. 242, ¶ 28, 77 P.3d 40, 46 (2003) (Nord-strom II), that vacated six death sentences the respondent judge had imposed on Nord-strom’s first-degree murder convictions and remanded the case for resentencing by a jury pursuant to A.R.S. §§ 13-703 and 13-703.01. The respondent judge ruled that Nordstrom was only entitled to have a jury weigh the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Scott Douglas NordstromArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. LewandowskiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Gorney v. MeaneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Lear v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Sierra Tucson Crc Health Group v. Louise LitwackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.