Legal Opinion

State v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 23, 2003No. 2 CA-SA 2003-0003PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner State of Arizona challenges two presentence orders the respondent judge entered in the underlying criminal case, in which real party in interest Jonathan McMullen pled guilty to reckless manslaughter. Based on Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), and Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002) (Ring II), the respondent judge first ordered that the state would have to prove, in a jury trial and beyond a reasonable doubt, any aggravating circumstances…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Walton v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. State v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. Resendis-FelixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  5. State v. FeblesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API