Legal Opinion

Di Ciano v. Western Contracting Corp.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 18, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 33497; Admiralty No. 333 of 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN DUSEN, District Judge,

TMs motion is now before the court on defendant-respondent’s (hereinafter called “defendant”) Motions to Set Aside and Vacate Service of Process (Document 5 in Civil Action No. 33497 and Document 3 in Admiralty No. 333 of 1963).

Defendant a registered foreign corporation,1 *but one which is not doing business” in Pennsylvania. Plaintiff-libellant (hereinafter called “plaintiff”), a New Jersey resident, brought these two actions against defendant for injuries he sustained on defendant’s vessel while outside the Commonwealth. A United States Marshal made service on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Carlisle v. S. C. Loveland Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  5. Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fischman v. FischmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Kyle v. Days Inn of America, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Coriander, Inc. v. Universal Carloading & Distributing Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1980
  4. Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc. v. Hebrew National Kosher Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API