Legal Opinion
Carlisle v. S. C. Loveland Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 18, 1949No. 9704PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
This in a sense is a companion case to Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corporation (“Kelly Pile”) at our No. 9732, 175 F.2d 414.1 In the instant case Carlisle, a citizen of New Jersey, brought suit against 5. C. Loveland Company (“Loveland”), stated in the complaint to be a corporation created under the laws of Pennsylvania, alleging acts of negligence by Loveland which occurred in Delaware and which resulted in injury to him. Loveland answered, alleging that it was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. It seems to be conceded that Loveland is a Delaware…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Orange Theatre Corp. v. Rayherstz Amusement Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1944
- Bostwick v. BrinkerhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Jones v. Waterman SS CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Brun v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Schoen v. Mountain Producers CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American District Telegraph Co. v. KittlesonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Pabellon v. Grace Line, Inc. (Coston Supply Co., Third-And-Fourth-Party Defendants)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Lane v. Celanese Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1950
- Brandt v. OlsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
- Sechrist v. DykeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.