Legal Opinion
Carlisle v. Kelly Pile & Foundation Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 18, 1949No. 9732PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff, Carlisle, a citizen of New Jersey, brought suit in the court below against Kelly Pile and Foundation Corporation (“Kelly Pile”), a New York corporation, alleging acts of negligence by Kelly Pile which occurred in Delaware and which resulted in injury to Carlisle. The court dismissed the complaint for want of proper venue.1 See Section 51 of the Judicial Code of 1911.2 The plaintiff has appealed.
The record shows that the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania on May 21, 1941 granted to Kelly Pile a certificate of au*415thority to transact business in Pennsylvania pursuant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Dehne v. Hillman Investment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Kelly v. International Clay Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
- Dalton v. Shakespeare Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
- Urso v. ScalesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1950
- Carlisle v. S. C. Loveland Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Herpst v. S. B. I. Liquidating Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.