Legal Opinion

Brandt Ex Rel. Estate of Brandt v. Gooding

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 10, 2006No. 26135PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

This is a legal malpractice action. The trial court granted summary judgment, found the plaintiff to be in contempt, and dismissed the complaint as a sanction. In addition, the trial court sentenced the plaintiff to six months imprisonment, issued a restraining order, and awarded court costs and attorneys’ fees to the defendant. The plaintiff appealed. We hold that the trial court properly granted summary judgment, and properly issued criminal and civil contempt sanctions. Additionally, the court correctly awarded costs. Therefore, we affirm.

Factual/Procedural Background

This…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Baird v. Charleston CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  4. Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Dove v. Gold Kist, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. Brandt v. GoodingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
  3. Miller v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Rhoad v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Brandt v. OzmintDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API