Rhoad v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BEATTY, J.:
David Rhoad appeals the post-conviction relief (PCR) judge’s decision to hold him in contempt. We affirm. 1
FACTS
Rhoad was convicted of DUI and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature (CDVHAN) and sentenced to five years imprisonment. Rhoad filed a PCR application, but he informed the PCR judge on the day of the hearing that he wished to withdraw his application. After the judge accepted his withdrawal, Rhoad made an obscene gesture to his trial counsel before leaving the courtroom.
Rhoad was brought back into the courtroom and questioned about his actions. Rhoad…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Codispoti v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- State v. JohnstonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Ex Parte BlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Myrick v. Nexsen Pruet Jacobs Pollard & Robinson, LLPSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- The Gulfstream Café v. J. Mark LawhonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2022