Legal Opinion
Brandt v. Ozmint
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 10, 2009No. Civil Action 6:06 — 01938— HFF-WMCPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HENRY F. FLOYD, District Judge.
This case was filed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that Petitioner’s motion for summary judgment be granted. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.
The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Brandt v. GoodingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- State v. JollyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2013