Legal Opinion

Sines v. Brumfield

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1960No. 8938PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Appellant Ray Brumfield, employer, will be referred to as the appellant.

For a time prior to and on August 2, 1959, the relationship of principal and independent contractor existed between appellant and Potlatch Forests, Inc., under a logging contract; Jay Brumfield, appellant’s brother, and Truman G. Sines, Sr., were appellant’s employees, — Brumfield as woods superintendent and Sines as a jammer operator.

Under a portion of his logging contract, which he deemed to be obligatory, appellant entered into an arrangement with Pot-latch Timber Protective Association (hereinafter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Pinson Ex Rel. Pinson v. Minidoka Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Moon v. ErvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Hiebert v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Shamburg v. ShamburgNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Anderson v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Adam v. Titan Equipment Supply Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Yount v. Boundary CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Kennedy v. ForestIdaho Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API