Yount v. Boundary County
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BISTLINE, Justice.
INTRODUCTION
The Commission, noting that this was a case of first impression in Idaho, turned to other jurisdictions for guidance. Observing that it had found only one case which compensated a juror, and that nine other states had determined that jurors are not employees within the purview of workers’ compensation law, it concluded that I.C. § 72-205 is substantially similar to the statutory provisions of the states which denied compensation and ruled that an Idaho juror is not covered, as there is no contract of hire either express or implied. R. 48. The Commission did not…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hannigan v. GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Hicks v. Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Hattenburg v. BlanksIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Patricia Marek v. Hecla, LimitedIdaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Maravilla v. J. R. Simplot Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2016
- Wilson v. Georgetown CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Thompson v. Burley Inn, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2024
- Dolph v. Hecla Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.