Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. of Idaho

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1987No. 16319PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This appeal comes to us from a certified partial summary judgment dismissing a claim for breach of contract and wrongful termination of employment. The claimant, Steve Anderson, sued for general damages and recovery of wrongfully withheld employment benefits after he was terminated as an insurance agent. We are asked to decide whether the district court erred in finding that Anderson was not an “employee” and, therefore, was not entitled to recover the purported benefits. We also must decide whether Anderson was terminated under circumstances violating his contract rights or…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Frampton v. Central Indiana Gas CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Petermann v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 396California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Monge v. Beebe Rubber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Leeke v. GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Edmondson v. Shearer Lumber ProductsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Sorensen v. Comm Tek, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. MerlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Grand Hotel Gift Shop v. Granite State InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API