Legal Opinion
Barton v. City of Bristol
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 24, 2003No. CIV.3:02 CV 1210 PCDPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DORSEY, District Judge.
Defendants Suchinski, Mullaney, Dekow, Bristol Police Union Local # 754, and the City of Bristol move for summary judgment. [Doc. No. 64, 68, 70], For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motions are granted.
I. Background 1
Plaintiff was hired by the Bristol Police Department in August, 1986. In June, 1997 he was promoted to detective and thereafter assigned to the narcotics unit. Mullaney, a Detective Sergeant in the Bristol Police Department, supervised detectives on the narcotics team, including Plaintiff. On August…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cassidy v. ScoppettaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Hipsky v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Lynch v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2004
- Henderson v. New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Alvarado v. PBM, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.