Legal Opinion
Lynch v. McNamara
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided October 13, 2004No. CIV. 3:03CV381(MRK)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
KRAVITZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff, State Police Sergeant Todd Lynch, has sued two fellow State Police Officers and an Assistant State’s Attorney under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for allegedly violating his due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. Sgt. Lynch’s claim arises from a State Police investigation of a citizen complaint against him. Presently before the Court is the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgement [doc. # 34]. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion.
I
The relevant facts are drawn from the parties’ pleadings and attached exhibits…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adams v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Cassidy v. ScoppettaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Rossi v. West Haven Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Kearney v. City of Bridgeport Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Lawrence v. Hartnell Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011