Legal Opinion
Henderson v. New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 14, 2006No. 05 Civ. 213(CM)(LMS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
■DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MCMAHON, District Judge.
Defendants Anthony Loscalzo and Glenn Goord have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Plaintiff, who is represented by counsel, has not responded to the motion; he has been in default since mid-November. 1
Plaintiff is a former DOCS corrections officer. Plaintiff was terminated by DOCS pursuant to a April 28, 2003 Notice of Discipline (“NOD”) After a full arbitration hearing, an independent arbitrator denied plaintiffs challenge to the Notice of Discipline, and…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thomas v. iStar Financial, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Mione v. McGrathDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Manbeck v. Katonah-Lewisboro School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Howard v. Town of BethelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007