Legal Opinion

Ak-Chin Indian Community v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 14, 2009No. 06-932 LPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court are Plaintiffs Motion to Compel and Memorandum in Support (plaintiffs Motion or Pl.’s Mot.), Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Records from the American Indian Records Repository (defendant’s Response or Def.’s Resp.), and Plaintiffs Reply in Support of Motion to Compel (plaintiffs Reply or Pl.’s Reply).

I. Background

A. Procedural History

Following the parties’ extensive briefing on plaintiffs Motion, the court issued an order GRANTING plaintiffs Motion. Order of Dee. 5, 2008, dkt. no. 81. The court held a telephonic status…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phoenix W. Wheeler, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Persons Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  2. Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
  3. Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
  4. In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Rowlin v. Alabama Dep't of Public SafetyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Osage Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  2. Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. Amazon Technologies, Inc. v. Jeffrey S. Wax, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API