Quapaw Tribe of Oklahoma v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Discovery Dispute; Organization and Labeling of Documents Produced in Haphazard Fashion; Government’s Duty to Designate Person(s) to Testify at Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition.
OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR DISCOVERY RELIEF
WHEELER, Judge.
In these Indian Tribe eases involving significant claims against the United States for breach of fiduciary duty, among other things, Plaintiffs filed a motion for discovery relief on August 14, 2015 seeking an order in their favor on the following grounds: (1) the Government failed substantially and in multiple ways to produce documents in compliance…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Collins & Aikman Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Zoltek Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
- Hagemeyer North America, Inc. v. Gateway Data Sciences Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securiforce International America, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016