Legal Opinion
House of Sight & Sound, Inc. v. Faulkner
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 5, 1995No. 85356PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HANSEN, Judge:
Appellant, House of Sight & Sound (“Sight & Sound”), seeks review of the trial court’s order which dissolved a temporary restraining order and denied its motion for temporary injunction. Sight & Sound filed this action to enjoin Appellees, six attorneys, from “false and malicious advertising” of another lawsuit brought by certain plaintiffs who are represented by the attomey-Appel-lees, and also to enjoin Appellees from seeking additional plaintiffs in that lawsuit. In addition to injunctive relief, Sight & Sound prayed for damages. 1 After the presentation of Sight &…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Cleary Petroleum Corp. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Shores v. First City Bank Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tulsa Order of Police Lodge No. 93 v. City of TulsaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Gonzales v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010