Legal Opinion

Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. Pope

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 27, 1990No. 72180PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPALA, Vice Chief Justice.

Two issues are tendered for our decision in this second appeal from denial of a hospital’s quest that payment be ordered for the decedent’s last illness expenses without a timely statutory creditor’s claim:2 [1] Does Oklahoma law charge the estate representative with knowledge that the hospital where the decedent died as a paying patient was a potential creditor of the estate? and if so [2] Did the hospital effectively relinquish that which was its constitutional due — actual notice under Oklahoma’s nonclaim statute? We answer the first question in the affirmative…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Curtis Publishing Co. v. ButtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Manley v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Bivins v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  5. Booth v. McKnightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API