Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 2010No. 106,788PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEBORAH B. BARNES, Judge.

1 This accelerated 1 appeal is brought by the State of Oklahoma (State) and the City of Oklahoma City (City) to challenge the trial court's ruling that 11 O.S. Supp.2008 § 22-115.1, 2 a statute enacted in 2008, restricting the location of dog kennels near schools or licensed day care facilities, is unconstitutional as applied to appellee Kenneth Richard Gonzales (Gonzales). Gonzales owns an unlicensed dog kennel that is located within 2,500 feet of Villa Teresa Moore School, a school and day care facility operated by the Carmel-ite Sisters of St. Teresa. 3

{2 On June…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Rock Island, Arkansas & Louisiana Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Hendrick v. WaltersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Reeds v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. Horizons, Inc. v. Keo Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MATERIAL SERVICE CORP. v. TOWN OF FITZHUGHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. MATERIAL SERVICE CORP. v. TOWN OF FITZHUGHCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Singh v. SidhuCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API