Legal Opinion

Kirschstein v. Haynes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1990No. 67655PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAVENDER, Justice:

Four central issues are presented in this case. They are: 1) whether we will recognize an absolute privilege to bar defamation actions for communications by attorneys, parties and witnesses having some relation to and made preliminary to a proposed judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding; 2) if the absolute privilege is recognized does it bar not only a defamation action, but a cause premised on the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress; 3) were the trial court and the Court of Appeals correct in granting and affirming, respectively, summary judgment in favor of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Rainier's Dairies v. Raritan Valley Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  2. Ribas v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  4. Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Kelley v. BonneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  3. Peterson v. GrishamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  4. Knight v. Mooring Capital Fund, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. Gaylord Entertainment Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API