Legal Opinion
Wm. G. Roe & Company v. Armour & Company, Armour & Company v. Wm. G. Roe & Company
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 25, 1969No. 26208PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
This Florida diversity case is before this Court for the second time. The suit originated in 1963 when William G. Roe & Company (Roe) sued Armour & Company (Armour) claiming that the emission of fluorine gas from Armour’s phosphate plant resulted in the decreased production of the citrus crop in Roe’s nearby orange grove during the 1963 — 1964 season. After a non-jury trial, the district court entered its findings of fact and conclusions of law and rendered judgment for defendant Armour. The district court found that emission of fluorine gas from Armour’s plant…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- White v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company v. Rosa Lee Leaman RoosthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- Borders v. RippyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Johnny Mack Westbrook v. Walter D. Zant, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- R. H. Manning v. M/v "Sea Road", Her Engines, Etc., and Sea Road Shipping Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- RA Jones & Sons, Inc. v. HolmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- TODD AND COMPANY, INC. and Thomas K. Langbein, Petitioners, v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Louis L. Seiffert, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.