Legal Opinion

The United States of America v. Edward Paul Washington

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 3, 1956No. 12009_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant was charged with unlawfully passing a forged and altered Post Office money order and with having in his possession another money order which he falsely altered in a material respect.

In open court, where he was represented by competent assigned counsel, he executed a written waiver of indictment. The waiver and an information against him were filed immediately thereafter. In response to the court’s question, he said he understood that in those circumstances the information would have the same effect as if he had been indicted. The court also asked him if anyone had made any promises…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  3. United States v. RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. John Eugene KniessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  3. United States v. Ernest James ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  4. W. R. Britton v. Dowell, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
  5. Daniel Castano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API