Legal Opinion

San Joaquin County Public Conservator v. Joel E.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 2005No. C046017PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

In this case, we resolve the question of whether a prospective conservatee has the right to represent himself in proceedings to appoint a conservator. In so doing, we touch upon the greater issue of what rights must be afforded a proposed conservatee in civil commitment proceedings.

The San Joaquin County Public Conservator (the public conservator) filed a petition to appoint a conservator for objector Joel E. (Joel). Following a court hearing at which Joel was adjudged gravely disabled, he requested a jury trial on the conservatorship petition. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 5350,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. John L.California Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Conservatorship of George H.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. In re S.M.Montana Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Conservatorship of David L.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API