Legal Opinion
Wainscoat v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1973No. 71-1587PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CRARY, District Judge:
Appellants Wainscoat, Baker, Henry, Wells and Morrison claim to be entitled to overtime compensation for work in excess of forty hours per week during various monthly periods from October, 1965, through 1967 under the provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. The case was tried in October, 1970. No evidence was presented as to the claim of appellant Harlan.
Each of the appellants, Wainscoat, Baker, Henry and Wells, during the time involved, worked for appellee Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a corporation, (REECo) as an “Operations…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- McReynolds v. Pocahontas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Robert Emmett Hoyt v. General Insurance Company of America, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Phillips v. Federal Cartridge CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1947
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Larry Worthington, Roger Cameron, David Davey and Gerald Kent, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- G.W. Cobb v. Finest Foods, Inc., D/B/A a & G CafeteriasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- George Wainscoat v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a Corporation, Joe Harlan v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- McCune v. Oregon Senior Services DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.