Legal Opinion

Robert Emmett Hoyt v. General Insurance Company of America, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1957No. 15400_1PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BONE, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by Robert Emmett Hoyt (hereafter Hoyt) to recover payment for overtime work from the General Insurance Company of America under Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 207. The lower court found for the defendant on the ground that plaintiff was an “administrative employee” within the meaning of Section 13 of the Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 213, and therefore exempt from the provisions of Section 7 of the Act.

Appellee, General Insurance Company of America (hereafter General) is engaged in the general insurance business; authorized to do…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Schumann v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rex L. Bothell v. Phase Metrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Adam v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Gary O'dell, Cross-Appellant v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. Larry Worthington, Roger Cameron, David Davey and Gerald Kent, Plaintiffs- Cross-Appellees v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc., a Washington Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. George Wainscoat v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a Corporation, Joe Harlan v. Reynolds Electrical & Engineering Co., Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API