Legal Opinion
McCune v. Oregon Senior Services Division
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 26, 1990No. 88-3843PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
SUMMARY
Appellants are live-in attendants for elderly and disabled persons. Clients pay for their services with federal and state assistance disbursed by appellees. This action was brought by appellants pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. (1982 & Supp.1989), seeking minimum wage for all hours worked. The district court granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment, 643 F.Supp. 1444 (1986), finding that services performed by appellants were specifically exempted from the Act. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Appellants are full-time,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walling v. General Industries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance v. HecklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bonnette v. California Health & Welfare AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Guerrero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Carol Cox v. Acme Health Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lott v. RigbyDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1990
- Rosa Salyer v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation and Wesley Trimble, AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Bowler v. Deseret Village Ass'n, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.