Orwitz v. Board of Dental Examiners
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.
On November 26, 1940, this court rendered a decision in Orwitz v. Board of Dental Examiners (41 Cal.App.2d 653 [107 P.2d 407]), affirming the judgment of the trial court denying petitioner a writ of mandate, after trial de novo, in a proceeding brought by petitioner to have annulled the action of the Board of Dental Examiners suspending his license to practice dentistry. Thereafter, and on November 19, 1941, petitioner instituted the present proceeding in mandamus whereby he again sought to have the action of said board annulled. In his petition for the writ he made no reference whatever to…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Washington Bridge Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Livermore v. BealCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Gore v. BingamanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bailey v. Fosca Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Coughlin v. CoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Putnam v. PutnamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943