State v. J.E.S.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Randall, Judge.*
The juvenile court revoked J.E.S.’s EJJ probation because he possessed a weapon in violation of the terms of his probation. Although the probation proceedings were commenced before J.E.S. turned 21, possession of the weapon was not alleged until after J.E.S. turned 21. The juvenile court incorrectly based revocation of J.E.S.’s probation on J.E.S.’s possession of a weapon. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
In September 2003, 17-year-old J.E.S. was arrested and charged with aiding and *66abetting aggravated robbery and aiding and abetting attempted aggravated robbery. In February…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. BehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. B.Y.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re the Welfare of M.J.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Nicholas Robert Schimmel v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. JESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009