Amanda Jean Lunzer v. State of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRK, Judge.
Appellant Amanda Jean Lunzer challenges the denial of her petition for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing, arguing that she is entitled to withdraw her guilty plea to fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance due to testing deficiencies at the St. Paul Police Department Crime Lab (SPPDCL). On the question of subject-matter jurisdiction, she argues that her stay of adjudication should be considered a conviction for purposes of postconviction relief, and, if not, that this court should exercise discretionary review due to the collateral consequences…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Gordon v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. GreenoughCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018