Legal Opinion
Harris v. Fulwood
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 30, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1215PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, challenges on constitutional grounds his parole revocation proceedings conducted by the United States Parole Commission (“Commission”). See generally Compl. [Dkt. # 1], He sues Commission Chairman Isaac Ful-wood, Jr., and Hearing Examiner Paul Howard under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), and his former attorney, Rashida Edmondson of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia (“PDS”), and Georgetown University…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Jackson v. District Hospital Partner, L.P.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- McNair v. SmootDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Woodson v. SmithDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021