Legal Opinion

Brown v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 6, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1777PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge

In this action for a writ of habeas corpus, petitioner Raymond Brown III challenges the United States Parole Commission’s authority to revoke his parole and to rescind credit for the eight years he spent on parole (“street-time credit”). Petitioner contends that the Commission has violated the separation of powers doctrine and the Constitution’s ex post facto clause and double jeopardy clause. The Commission counters that petitioner’s grounds for relief lack merit. See Gov’t’s Opp’n to Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Richardson v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API