Brown v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
AMY BERMAN JACKSON, United States District Judge
In this action for a writ of habeas corpus, petitioner Raymond Brown III challenges the United States Parole Commission’s authority to revoke his parole and to rescind credit for the eight years he spent on parole (“street-time credit”). Petitioner contends that the Commission has violated the separation of powers doctrine and the Constitution’s ex post facto clause and double jeopardy clause. The Commission counters that petitioner’s grounds for relief lack merit. See Gov’t’s Opp’n to Pet’r’s Pet. for a Writ of Habeas Corpus…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States Parole Commission v. NobleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Richardson v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017