Legal Opinion

State v. Thompson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1976No. 45PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

McEachern’s Appeal

On his appeal defendant McEachern brings forward four assignments of error, upon which he makes three contentions. The first (based upon assignments Nos. 5 and 9) is that the trial judge erred in admitting the testimony of Danny J. Walters and Peggy Grainger, which tended to show that Mc-Eachern was guilty of another and independent criminal offense.

As pointed out in the preliminary statement of facts, witnesses Walters and Grainger testified over defendant’s objection, that on the night of 7 February 1975 they were “parking” in the Lover’s Lane area…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  2. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. AsheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API