United States v. Courtier
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Quinn, Chief Judge:
At trial, the accused moved for a new Article 32 investigation. Among other things, he alleged that his request for individual military counsel for the investigation had been improperly refused. The motion was denied. Thereupon, the accused entered a plea of guilty to all the offenses charged and was duly sentenced. We are now asked to reverse the conviction and dismiss the charges on the ground that denial of the motion was prejudicial error.
Several actions by the accused in connection with his request for Captain Carmichael as individual counsel for the Article 32…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. TellierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
- United States v. NicholsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. WordenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. ClarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
- United States v. PackerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. BlakneyU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. GriffinU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. PorterU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.