Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Worden

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 26, 1968No. 20,703PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

A board of review found there were infringements upon the accused’s right to consult counsel during the pretrial proceedings, but it concluded there was “no hint” of prejudice and affirmed the findings of guilty. We granted review to consider the correctness of this decision.

In early October 1966, the accused was “picked up” and interrogated by agents of the Office of Special Investigations, who were conducting an investigation into marihuana oifenses at Castle Air Force Base, California. Advised of his right to remain silent and to consult counsel, he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. GunnelsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. TellierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  5. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  2. United States v. CastlemanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  3. United States v. CourtierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. TebsheranyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. San Antonio Express-News v. MorrowUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API