Legal Opinion

Konover v. Kolakowski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 18, 2018No. AC40173, AC40434PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

This action arises from the indemnification provisions in a stock purchase and sales agreement (agreement) between the plaintiff Michael Konover 1 and the defendants Michael Kolakowski, Simon Etzel, and Eric Brown (the buyers) 2 for the buyers' purchase of Konover's stock in the KBE Building Corporation (KBE). 3 The plaintiffs appeal from the trial court's rendering of partial summary judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court erroneously ruled that the parties' agreement does not obligate the defendants to reimburse Konover for legal fees…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Levine v. MasseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Sims v. Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Isham v. IshamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Fernschild v. Comm'r of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Raczkowski v. McFarlaneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  2. Fiorillo v. HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
  3. Blaine v. BurnesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  4. Cosmetic Laser, Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  5. Konover v. KolakowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API