Legal Opinion
Cosmetic Laser, Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 11, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00638Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT COSMETIC LASER, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly No. 3:20-cv-00638 (SRU) situated, Plaintiff, v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS Cosmetic Laser, Inc. (“Cosmetic Laser”) owns multiple spas in Ohio that were shut down during the COVID-19 pandemic. Individually, and on behalf of other class members, Cosmetic Laser sued its property insurer, Twin City Fire Insurance Company (“Twin City”), for breach of contract. Cosmetic Laser asserts various theories for why its losses are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.