Legal Opinion

DiNapoli v. Doudera

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 30, 1992No. 10264PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a hearing in damages, awarding to the plaintiff the net sum of $800.251 in an action brought to recover for dam*109age to leased premises caused by the defendant. The plaintiff claims that the trial court’s findings and conclusions were contrary to the facts and evidence presented. We agree.

The pertinent undisputed facts are as follows. The plaintiff was the owner of certain residential premises located at 21 Brainard Road in West Hartford. On March 1,1988, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Bertozzi v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Expressway Associates II v. Friendly Ice Cream Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. O'Bymachow v. O'BymachowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Cupina v. BernklauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wren v. MacPherson Interiors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  2. Owens v. New Britain General HospitalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Downing v. DragoneConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. Roberson v. AubinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  5. Martin v. MartinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API