Legal Opinion

Roberson v. Aubin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 23, 2010No. AC 30435PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The plaintiffs, Kathleen Roberson and John C. Roberson, appeal from the judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Melissa C. Aubin. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly decided the case (1) on findings of fact that were clearly erroneous, (2) without examining the exhibits and (3) on an incorrect interpretation of the elements of adverse possession. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the disposition of the plaintiffs’ appeal. The subject of this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DiBella v. WidlitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Giamattei v. DicerboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  3. DiNapoli v. DouderaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  4. Martinez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  5. Gemmell v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson v. PoirierConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Fernwood Realty, LLC v. Aerocision, LLC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  3. In re Ja-lyn R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
  4. Vering v. Groton Long Point Assn., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API