Legal Opinion

People v. Thacker

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1985No. F003564PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, Acting P. J.-

Statement of the Case

Appellant stands convicted after a jury trial of grand theft in violation of Penal Code section 487, subdivision 1 (count I) and forgery in violation of Penal Code section 470 (counts II, III, IV).

Appellant makes two contentions on appeal. First, there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction of grand theft. He argues that the monies taken “were as much his funds as they were those of [the alleged victim],” i.e., the monies were part of the working capital of the corporation formed by appellant and the alleged victim. Second,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. FosselmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. South Shore Land Co. v. PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Anders v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Blue Cross of Northern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Magnolia Square Homeowners Ass'n v. Safeco InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. People v. MendozaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In re MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API