Legal Opinion

Salukas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 5, 1985No. Appeal, No. 2280 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■Opinion by.Judge Rogers,

Edward Salukas (petitioner) has appealed from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a referee’s grant of a credit against his employer’s obligation to pay workmen’s compensation for wages paid the petitioner for the holiday of July 5,1982.

The facts of this case are not in dispute. The referee accurately states them in his findings:

2. On or about June 2, 1982, Claimant suffered an injury within the course of his employment____

3. As a result of said injury, Claimant was unable to perform his job from June 7,1982, up to and including August…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hartwell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. McGoldrick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Murhon v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Brimmer v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API