Legal Opinion
Shaw v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 24, 2010No. 2009-5117PublishedCited by 211 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Mr. Michael Shaw applied for interim attorneys’ fees and costs while pursuing a cause of action for compensation under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l et seq. The Special Master awarded Mr. Shaw the undisputed portion of his request and deferred consideration of the remaining fees and costs until the submission of a final petition for fees and costs. Shaw v. Sec’y of HHS, No. 01-707, 2009 WL 1010058, at *3 (Fed.Cl. Mar.27, 2009). Mr. Shaw sought review in the United States Court of Federal Claims, and that court dismissed, concluding that it lacked jurisdiction to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nathaniel Saxton, by and Through His Legal Representatives, Steven and Candace Saxton v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Rodriguez ex rel. Estate of Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Rosenfeld v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Doe/11 ex rel. Estate of Doe/11 v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by211 opinions
- McKellar v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Woods v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Rehn v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Joan Caves v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Lamare v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.