Legal Opinion
Rehn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 14, 2016No. 14-1012VPublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vaccine case; review of an award of interim attorneys’ fees; 42 U.S.C. § SOOaa-15(e)(1); good faith; reasonable basis for petition; discretionary basis for award
OPINION AND ORDER 1
LETTOW, Judge.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services (“government” or “respondent”) requests that this court review a special master’s decision awarding interim attorneys’ fees and costs to Mr. Randall Knutson. See Resp’t’s Mem. in Support of Her Mot. for Review (“Resp’t’s Mot.”), EOF No. 40 (seeking reversal of Rehn v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., No. 14-1012V, 2015 WL 9412813 (Fed.Cl.Spec.Mstr. Dec. 1,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Sebelius v. CloerSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Pgba, LLC v. United States, and Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Raymo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Carter v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Cottingham v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Spahn v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Abbott v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.