Legal Opinion
Lamare v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided October 27, 2015No. 12-312PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for Review; Redaction; Interim Fees Award.
ORDER
MARIAN BLANK HORN, Judge
FINDINGS OF FACT
The only issue before this court is whether or not to grant petitioner’s request for redaction of the Special Master’s Decision issued on December 8, 2014, denying an interim fees petition submitted by petitioner’s attorney. On May 11, 2012, petitioner Katie La-mare filed a claim for compensation for injuries allegedly resulting fri>m administration of the Human Papillomavirus Virus (HPV) Gardasil vaccinations, as well as attorneys’ fees and costs, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Avera v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- United States Department of State v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- W.C. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Shaw v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- W.C. v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Tarsell v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- A. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- B. v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Bishara v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Clark v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.