Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Squire v. Murfey, Blossom & Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1936No. 25838PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

The Superintendent of Banks will be referred to herein as plaintiff, and Murfey, Blossom & Company as defendant.

There are but two questions in this case, viz.:

1. In an action by the Superintendent of Banks to collect the double liability of the stockholders of an insolvent Ohio bank, may a party who appears as a stockholder of record at the time the bank was closed avoid his double liability by showing that he had sold his shares more than sixty days before the bank was closed?

2. On the trial of such action, is such record stockholder entitled to a trial by jury?

There are, of course, some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitney v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Damascus Mfg. Co. v. Union Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. BancOhio National Bank v. Nursing Center Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Arrowhead Investments, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. State of Ohio ex rel. Squire v. PorterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API