Legal Opinion

People v. Liggett

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1912No. Crim. No. 173PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yuba County, and from an order denying a new trial. K. S. Mahon, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of rape alleged to have been committed, about the twentieth day of July, 1911, on a child of the age of twelve years and was' sentenced to serve twenty years in the Folsom penitentiary. Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

It is claimed that the verdict of guilty rested on the testimony of the prosecuting witness and upon the testimony of her father and mother as to what occurred at a conference with the defendant about August 4th, following the alleged crime. The girl’s testimony was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. CurrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  3. People v. BarkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. People v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. AnthonyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. State v. RichardsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Malone v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1953
  4. People v. CastroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Deffenbaugh v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API