Legal Opinion

People v. Squires

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1893No. 20984PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of Sau Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated iu the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

The defendant was convicted of a felony in asking for and agreeing to receive a bribe as a juror. He appeals from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. The indictment upon which he was tried was found, presented, and tiled June 7, 1892, and charges that on the seventh day of June, 1892, while defendant was a juror in a case on trial in the superior court of San Francisco, the pend-ency of which is particularly set out and described in the indictment, “said Squires did wilfully, unlawfully, corruptly, and feloneously ask and agree to receive of and from one James F.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. NortheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. DiedrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. People v. WeitzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. DurnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. State v. EmmanuelWashington Supreme Court · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API