Central Advertising Co. v. St Joseph Township
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, P.J.
Plaintiff initiated the present action for the purpose of having defendant’s sign ordinance declared illegal under the Highway Advertising Act, MCL 252.301 et seq.; MSA 9.391(101) et seq., based upon state pre-emption of regulation. The trial court found defendant’s off-premises sign ordinance illegal as it prohibited the erection of any off-premises sign. The trial court found that the Highway Advertising Act did not pre-empt defendant’s ability to require minimum setback distances within adjacant areas. The trial court then remanded the cause to the township for the purpose of adopting a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Michigan License Beverage Ass'n v. Behnan Hall, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Central Advertising Co. v. City of Ann ArborMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Township of Superior v. Reimel Sign Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Dingeman Advertising, Inc v. Township of SaginawMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Libra Group, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Scadron v. City of Des PlainesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Oshtemo Charter Township v. Central Advertising Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ottawa County Farms, Inc v. Polkton TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Homer Township v. Billboards by Johnson, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.