Legal Opinion

Homer Township v. Billboards by Johnson, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 6, 2006No. Docket 256216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

In this interlocutory appeal, we granted defendant leave to appeal a partial grant of summary disposition, in which the trial court held that the Highway Advertising Act (HAA), MCL 252.301 et seq., did not preempt two of plaintiffs billboard ordinances. One ordinance prohibited “cross-reader” billboards, which are two-sided billboards displaying advertising to highway traffic traveling in both directions. Defendant added a second face to an existing billboard, contrary to the permit issued by plaintiff, in the belief that plaintiffs ban on cross-reader billboards violated the HAA. Flaintiff…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lee v. MacOmb County Board of CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Stanton v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hucul Advertising, LLC v. Charter Township of GainesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Coldsprings Township v. Kalkaska County Zoning Board of AppealsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Radina v. Wieland Sales, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. People v. GadomskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Hucul Advertising v. Charter Twp. Of GainesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API