Legal Opinion

Eklund v. Vincent Brass and Aluminum Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 5, 1984No. C2-83-2007PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Clyde Eklund appeals from summary judgment for Vincent Brass and Aluminum Company in his suit based on wrongful termination of employment. Appellant-Ek-lund’s action included claims for breach of contract, breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Eklund also sought punitive damages under Minn. Stat. § 549.20 (1982). On appeal Eklund argues his claims presented genuine issues of material fact which were not appropriate for a summary judgment and that judgment dismissing his suit was contrary to law.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. United Press International, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Loren Johnson v. Minnesota Historical SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  2. Bagwell v. Peninsula Regional Medical CenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Loftness Specialized Farm Equipment, Inc. v. TwiestmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Corum v. Farm Credit ServicesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986
  5. Lee v. Metropolitan Airport CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API